I was actually originally going to attach this to my previously posted rule suggestion about regiving LR but did not know how to word it properly.
The other thing about LR that sprung into my mind that isn't mentioned in the rules is when a RED decides to willingly forfeit LR to another. It did surprise me that I could not find anything in the rules mentioning this considering how common it is for, when there are two REDs remaining, one RED decides to forfeit LR to the other. There are several reasons as to why a RED may do this, but among the most common reasons I've seen:
- They are about to do a minigame they think they'll lose.
- They want to be in the other RED's death request.
- They hope that the RED will choose an LR they like or in their favor -- to be more specific, they may hope that the RED will choose "Freeday for others" and choose them for a freeday as a token of gratitude.
This suggestion asks you guys whether or not the warden should have to obilge to a forfeit if a RED decides to do it.
Obviously, if there are more than two REDs alive, all but one would have to agree to forfeit for this to apply, otherwise, the warden has to decline it in this scenario as not all the REDs have given their permission.
Hypothetically, say if the "Yes, warden has to obilge if a RED forfeits" passes, the added rule would ideally be worded like this. I've worded it the best I can to avoid leaving out any hypothetical scenarios and make this poll a simple yes or no question, unlike the previous suggestion:
"- If there are two REDs remaining and one decides to willingly forfeit LR to the other for whatever reason, the warden must oblige and give LR to the RED that the other RED forfeited to, unless the receiving RED declines this. However, if the receiving RED decides to give the warden permission to decide on the matter, the warden may do so. Otherwise, if the receiving RED does not speak against it, the forfeit must be adhered to.
- If both REDs forfeit LR to the other, the forfeit will become invalid.
- A RED cannot forfeit LR to another RED who has rebelled.
- If there are three or more REDs, all but one RED must forfeit for it to be legal."
Or, if the "No" suggestion passes:
"- If there are two REDs remaining and one decides to willingly forfeit LR to the other for whatever reason, it will be up to the warden's discretion on whether or not they decide to allow this. However, if there are three or more REDs, all but one RED must forfeit for it to be considered.
- A RED cannot forfeit LR to another RED who has rebelled."
Due to how common forfeiting LR is, by adding a rule description about it this should prevent conflict if a warden decides to deny a forfeit.
To add to this, I think it may be helpful to add this to the rules as well regarding death request since it (surprisingly) also not mentioned in the rules:
- "A RED who has received DR may allow other non-rebelling REDs who are still alive to participate in their DR."
The other thing about LR that sprung into my mind that isn't mentioned in the rules is when a RED decides to willingly forfeit LR to another. It did surprise me that I could not find anything in the rules mentioning this considering how common it is for, when there are two REDs remaining, one RED decides to forfeit LR to the other. There are several reasons as to why a RED may do this, but among the most common reasons I've seen:
- They are about to do a minigame they think they'll lose.
- They want to be in the other RED's death request.
- They hope that the RED will choose an LR they like or in their favor -- to be more specific, they may hope that the RED will choose "Freeday for others" and choose them for a freeday as a token of gratitude.
This suggestion asks you guys whether or not the warden should have to obilge to a forfeit if a RED decides to do it.
Obviously, if there are more than two REDs alive, all but one would have to agree to forfeit for this to apply, otherwise, the warden has to decline it in this scenario as not all the REDs have given their permission.
Hypothetically, say if the "Yes, warden has to obilge if a RED forfeits" passes, the added rule would ideally be worded like this. I've worded it the best I can to avoid leaving out any hypothetical scenarios and make this poll a simple yes or no question, unlike the previous suggestion:
"- If there are two REDs remaining and one decides to willingly forfeit LR to the other for whatever reason, the warden must oblige and give LR to the RED that the other RED forfeited to, unless the receiving RED declines this. However, if the receiving RED decides to give the warden permission to decide on the matter, the warden may do so. Otherwise, if the receiving RED does not speak against it, the forfeit must be adhered to.
- If both REDs forfeit LR to the other, the forfeit will become invalid.
- A RED cannot forfeit LR to another RED who has rebelled.
- If there are three or more REDs, all but one RED must forfeit for it to be legal."
Or, if the "No" suggestion passes:
"- If there are two REDs remaining and one decides to willingly forfeit LR to the other for whatever reason, it will be up to the warden's discretion on whether or not they decide to allow this. However, if there are three or more REDs, all but one RED must forfeit for it to be considered.
- A RED cannot forfeit LR to another RED who has rebelled."
Due to how common forfeiting LR is, by adding a rule description about it this should prevent conflict if a warden decides to deny a forfeit.
To add to this, I think it may be helpful to add this to the rules as well regarding death request since it (surprisingly) also not mentioned in the rules:
- "A RED who has received DR may allow other non-rebelling REDs who are still alive to participate in their DR."