Accepted Magglet's Ban Appeal (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Magglet

Well-Known Member
Donator
Joined
Dec 10, 2016
Messages
1,268
SourceBans Ban URL: Panda Community SourceBans
Name of your Banned Steam Account: Magglet™ trade.tf

Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:57897786

Date and Time of the Ban:

Reason about the Ban: 12-24-17 15:41

Admin that Banned you: Le Captain Pootis

Before I fill in any further. I would like to point out a couple of things about my ban.

First of all the ban reason. "camping " In our rules, it states just straight "no camping" which it is clear as to why. But I looked into the definition of camping further.

I found the definition as to be "A camper is a video gamer who finds a strategic spot within a level and waits there for players, game-controlled enemies or choice items to appear. This strategy is known as camping."

If I look into the timing of the ban. I was told "go down right now" and banned 20 seconds later. I had stated in the chat, that I am finding an alternative entrance which there is, Attempting to find this entrance had not yet been achieved by myself as I am brand new to the map. So my case, for one the admin that banned me, seemed to have been able to read a whole strategy and rule broken within 20 seconds. This for one is an absolute disaster considering camping would be defined as a "strategy" and not something like insulting which can be seen instantly. For him to ban me from it a recording and or at least a prolonged period of time monitoring the situation should have taken place. He banned me with no clear warning at all other "go down right now" I had stated in the chat to me. As you can see here, I attempted to find an alternative route into a camped tight corridor containing multiple players who expected me to enter that route. It was a rational decision to take an alternative route.

I put it to the admin himself. As you know I wanted to see the evidence he held as a clear admin on the panda community, and you know the evidence is nice to clarify where I went wrong as a user. The admin stated "I warned you a second time" and other details of the event. For one I found no evidence of even a clear first warning. Secondly, he expected me to be able to complete a task which I was attempting to do. You cannot expect players to know every entrance of camped areas I was given 1 seconds after I announced my plan to find an alternative route before I was banned. This 1-second isn't even an exaggeration I stated I was attempting to follow the rules and was banned at exactly one second after.

Finally, the admin stated why I was banned he stated the whole thing.

"I saw you standing outside the door, not going in. I saw you jumping up on the barrels when I warned you. You then started taunting and walking the exact opposite way where I warned you a second time" For one if there is a second entrance why would it be exactly the way the sentries are simple logic states if I intend to win a game that I shouldn't enter that corridor. 2 I had no clear warnings or time to react to a situation. Even if I had turned around and went back to the corridor it would have taken me longer than 1 second to return. Regarding the "second warning," I am still yet to find it, but considering he "definitely" did I will keep looking.


Thanks for your time.

Why should you receive an unban?

As stated earlier, I believe the ban for one is complete trash, but 2 shows a level of incompetency within some members of the staff time in vsh. The level of ignorance I received off the admin when contact, he refused to show me evidence and was of little help to me. Other than a rather snide comment saying this was going to be a perm.

Regardless thank you for your time have a great day.
 
  • Creative
  • Dislike
Reactions: Jim and Zeprus
Okay so first of all, you were reported 3 times in total, by 3 different people. 2 of which I know pretty well.

[PandaBot] CallAdmin:
New report on: http://Panda-Community.com #05 | VS Saxton Hale

Reporter: Matt-erials Engineer (STEAM_0:0:60676189)
Target: Magglet™ (STEAM_0:0:57897786)
Reason: Camping as Hale
Join URL: steam://connect/193.192.59.191:27055

If you have handled the report, type !handle 114670
[PandaBot] CallAdmin:
New report on: http://Panda-Community.com #05 | VS Saxton Hale

Reporter: Lord Kruszwil (STEAM_0:0:219725216)
Target: Magglet™ (STEAM_0:0:57897786)
Reason: Camping as Hale
Join URL: steam://connect/193.192.59.191:27055

If you have handled the report, type !handle 114671
[PandaBot] CallAdmin:
New report on: http://Panda-Community.com #05 | VS Saxton Hale

Reporter: Neko (STEAM_0:0:68220893)
Target: Magglet™ (STEAM_0:0:57897786)
Reason: Camping as Hale
Join URL: steam://connect/193.192.59.191:27055

If you have handled the report, type !handle 114673
[PandaBot] CallAdmin: Call #114673 was handled by Le Captain Pootis

As I returned to my computer I saw you had been reported twice, but I didn't see the timestamp on the report, when I received yet another report on you. I waited about half a minute, when Matt-ers contacted me saying you were still camping.

So as I joined the server, I immediately started spectating you. You were standing right outside the corridor/tunnel whatever you wanna call it, and waiting for players to exit the room on the other side, so I'd definitely consider that camping. So when I spectated you for about 10 seconds standing there, I first warned you in @ chat (admin chat) saying "Hale don't camp", to which you replied something on the lines of "I'd rather not go that way", correct me if I'm wrong on that quote.

So you then quickly passed by the corridor/tunnel, and started standing on the barrels, taunting and waiting another 15-20 seconds, to which I told you in normal chat to stop camping (I probably should've added wasting time too, to that warning) where you said "I'll find another way". So you ran the exact opposite way, up the stairs and outside, where you started running towards your spawn. And as you said I waited about another 20-30 seconds before banning you after 2nd verbal warning. You replied both times in the chat, not sure if it was meant for me or someone else, but I saw you chat, meaning you must've seen my two warnings.

And the camping rule is overall harder to elaborate on that I'd want it to be, but the way that I and the other administrators on VSH enforce the camping rule, is when the hale is conciously deciding not to go to where the players are, and decisively waiting for them to approach you, which you were undoubtably doing.

Now to your final comment. That made me realize you're just gonna try to spin this in your favour, making me seem like an ignorant admin who didn't wanna talk to you, because I did. As I will prove with our entire chatlog, I was complying, replying and to the best of my ability, telling you to appeal on the forums so we could take it there instead.

Magglet™ trade.tf: Mhmm
Magglet™ trade.tf: Nice ban
BEAMERBOY: Point is?
Magglet™ trade.tf: Funny I actually recorded the situation
Magglet™ trade.tf: I had attempted to enter
BEAMERBOY: Fantastic
Magglet™ trade.tf: Just before a call
Magglet™ trade.tf: and failed
Magglet™ trade.tf: But killed one of them
Magglet™ trade.tf: U cannot call it camping if I have for one entereed
Magglet™ trade.tf: 2 killed someone
Magglet™ trade.tf: Surely that is straight admin abuse?
Magglet™ trade.tf: Just wondered what ground or evidence u banned me upon?
Magglet™ trade.tf: I come from trade u see
Magglet™ trade.tf: And most of the time when an admin bans someone
Magglet™ trade.tf: They have some kind of evidence against them
BEAMERBOY: I saw you standing outside the door, not going in. I saw you jumping up on the barrels, when I warned you. You then started taunting and walking the exact opposite way where I warned you a second time
Magglet™ trade.tf: No u didnt
BEAMERBOY: You completely disregarded everything I said when I banned oy.u
Magglet™ trade.tf: I stated in chat
Magglet™ trade.tf: I am going an alternative entrance
Magglet™ trade.tf: New map to me
Magglet™ trade.tf: Surely they didnt create a one way entrance
Magglet™ trade.tf: I stated that in the chat.
BEAMERBOY: There is 2 entrances, I saw you go down both.
Magglet™ trade.tf: No u didnt
Magglet™ trade.tf: U saw me wait outsideo ne
BEAMERBOY: Surely if you feel like this is unfair, appeal on the forums
Magglet™ trade.tf: I dont know the map well enough to call both entrances
Magglet™ trade.tf: Im not petit enough to waste my time on a 2 hour ban
Magglet™ trade.tf: https://gameme.panda-community.com/chat/tf5
Magglet™ trade.tf: U cannot state someone to go down a camped corridor
BEAMERBOY: Yeah regarding that, you're gonna get permed.
Magglet™ trade.tf: Why?
BEAMERBOY: Cause you have 6 bans in total.
BEAMERBOY: Complete disregard for our rules here.
Magglet™ trade.tf: 3 bans in totla
Magglet™ trade.tf: Im looking at them only 3?
BEAMERBOY: https://bans.panda-community.com/index.php?p=banlist&searchText=STEAM_0:0:57897786&Submit
BEAMERBOY: 6 bans
Magglet™ trade.tf: I have far https://bans.panda-community.com/index.php?p=banlist&searchText=magglet&Submit=Search
Magglet™ trade.tf: Yes
Magglet™ trade.tf: false ban on one of them
Magglet™ trade.tf: Already stated by fanthom
Magglet™ trade.tf: Due to a mistaked gag lead to a ban
Magglet™ trade.tf: Anyway
Magglet™ trade.tf: I guess Ill have to make an appeal or something
BEAMERBOY: Fantom hasn't banned you
BEAMERBOY: So yeah, appeal on the forums and I'll be happy to take it there with you
Magglet™ trade.tf: Can u please send me the evidence you have of me "camping"
Magglet™ trade.tf: And the map name please sir :)
BEAMERBOY: No, appeal it on the forums
Magglet™ trade.tf er nu Online.
Magglet™ trade.tf: Thank you for your help
Magglet™ trade.tf: Are you still online good sir?
BEAMERBOY: Yes
Magglet™ trade.tf: https://www.panda-community.com/threads/magglets-ban-appeal.15405/
Magglet™ trade.tf: Please feel free to post your viewings on the ban
Magglet™ trade.tf: And such
 
Okay so first of all, you were reported 3 times in total, by 3 different people. 2 of which I know pretty well.

[PandaBot] CallAdmin:
New report on: http://Panda-Community.com #05 | VS Saxton Hale

Reporter: Matt-erials Engineer (STEAM_0:0:60676189)
Target: Magglet™ (STEAM_0:0:57897786)
Reason: Camping as Hale
Join URL: steam://connect/193.192.59.191:27055

If you have handled the report, type !handle 114670
[PandaBot] CallAdmin:
New report on: http://Panda-Community.com #05 | VS Saxton Hale

Reporter: Lord Kruszwil (STEAM_0:0:219725216)
Target: Magglet™ (STEAM_0:0:57897786)
Reason: Camping as Hale
Join URL: steam://connect/193.192.59.191:27055

If you have handled the report, type !handle 114671
[PandaBot] CallAdmin:
New report on: http://Panda-Community.com #05 | VS Saxton Hale

Reporter: Neko (STEAM_0:0:68220893)
Target: Magglet™ (STEAM_0:0:57897786)
Reason: Camping as Hale
Join URL: steam://connect/193.192.59.191:27055

If you have handled the report, type !handle 114673
[PandaBot] CallAdmin: Call #114673 was handled by Le Captain Pootis

As I returned to my computer I saw you had been reported twice, but I didn't see the timestamp on the report, when I received yet another report on you. I waited about half a minute, when Matt-ers contacted me saying you were still camping.

So as I joined the server, I immediately started spectating you. You were standing right outside the corridor/tunnel whatever you wanna call it, and waiting for players to exit the room on the other side, so I'd definitely consider that camping. So when I spectated you for about 10 seconds standing there, I first warned you in @ chat (admin chat) saying "Hale don't camp", to which you replied something on the lines of "I'd rather not go that way", correct me if I'm wrong on that quote.

So you then quickly passed by the corridor/tunnel, and started standing on the barrels, taunting and waiting another 15-20 seconds, to which I told you in normal chat to stop camping (I probably should've added wasting time too, to that warning) where you said "I'll find another way". So you ran the exact opposite way, up the stairs and outside, where you started running towards your spawn. And as you said I waited about another 20-30 seconds before banning you after 2nd verbal warning. You replied both times in the chat, not sure if it was meant for me or someone else, but I saw you chat, meaning you must've seen my two warnings.

And the camping rule is overall harder to elaborate on that I'd want it to be, but the way that I and the other administrators on VSH enforce the camping rule, is when the hale is conciously deciding not to go to where the players are, and decisively waiting for them to approach you, which you were undoubtably doing.

Now to your final comment. That made me realize you're just gonna try to spin this in your favour, making me seem like an ignorant admin who didn't wanna talk to you, because I did. As I will prove with our entire chatlog, I was complying, replying and to the best of my ability, telling you to appeal on the forums so we could take it there instead.

Magglet™ trade.tf: Mhmm
Magglet™ trade.tf: Nice ban
BEAMERBOY: Point is?
Magglet™ trade.tf: Funny I actually recorded the situation
Magglet™ trade.tf: I had attempted to enter
BEAMERBOY: Fantastic
Magglet™ trade.tf: Just before a call
Magglet™ trade.tf: and failed
Magglet™ trade.tf: But killed one of them
Magglet™ trade.tf: U cannot call it camping if I have for one entereed
Magglet™ trade.tf: 2 killed someone
Magglet™ trade.tf: Surely that is straight admin abuse?
Magglet™ trade.tf: Just wondered what ground or evidence u banned me upon?
Magglet™ trade.tf: I come from trade u see
Magglet™ trade.tf: And most of the time when an admin bans someone
Magglet™ trade.tf: They have some kind of evidence against them
BEAMERBOY: I saw you standing outside the door, not going in. I saw you jumping up on the barrels, when I warned you. You then started taunting and walking the exact opposite way where I warned you a second time
Magglet™ trade.tf: No u didnt
BEAMERBOY: You completely disregarded everything I said when I banned oy.u
Magglet™ trade.tf: I stated in chat
Magglet™ trade.tf: I am going an alternative entrance
Magglet™ trade.tf: New map to me
Magglet™ trade.tf: Surely they didnt create a one way entrance
Magglet™ trade.tf: I stated that in the chat.
BEAMERBOY: There is 2 entrances, I saw you go down both.
Magglet™ trade.tf: No u didnt
Magglet™ trade.tf: U saw me wait outsideo ne
BEAMERBOY: Surely if you feel like this is unfair, appeal on the forums
Magglet™ trade.tf: I dont know the map well enough to call both entrances
Magglet™ trade.tf: Im not petit enough to waste my time on a 2 hour ban
Magglet™ trade.tf: https://gameme.panda-community.com/chat/tf5
Magglet™ trade.tf: U cannot state someone to go down a camped corridor
BEAMERBOY: Yeah regarding that, you're gonna get permed.
Magglet™ trade.tf: Why?
BEAMERBOY: Cause you have 6 bans in total.
BEAMERBOY: Complete disregard for our rules here.
Magglet™ trade.tf: 3 bans in totla
Magglet™ trade.tf: Im looking at them only 3?
BEAMERBOY: https://bans.panda-community.com/index.php?p=banlist&searchText=STEAM_0:0:57897786&Submit
BEAMERBOY: 6 bans
Magglet™ trade.tf: I have far https://bans.panda-community.com/index.php?p=banlist&searchText=magglet&Submit=Search
Magglet™ trade.tf: Yes
Magglet™ trade.tf: false ban on one of them
Magglet™ trade.tf: Already stated by fanthom
Magglet™ trade.tf:Due to a mistaked gag lead to a ban
Magglet™ trade.tf: Anyway
Magglet™ trade.tf: I guess Ill have to make an appeal or something
BEAMERBOY: Fantom hasn't banned you
BEAMERBOY: So yeah, appeal on the forums and I'll be happy to take it there with you
Magglet™ trade.tf: Can u please send me the evidence you have of me "camping"
Magglet™ trade.tf: And the map name please sir :)
BEAMERBOY: No, appeal it on the forums
Magglet™ trade.tf er nu Online.
Magglet™ trade.tf: Thank you for your help
Magglet™ trade.tf: Are you still online good sir?
BEAMERBOY: Yes
Magglet™ trade.tf: https://www.panda-community.com/threads/magglets-ban-appeal.15405/
Magglet™ trade.tf: Please feel free to post your viewings on the ban
Magglet™ trade.tf: And such

For one, I had made previous attempts to enter the corridor, but the fact is. There is literally no evidence. How on earth do you expect hales, to enter a corridor with a sentry body blocked by an ubered medic with soldiers shooting from behind. The fact is you have no evidence, you didn't provide me why a valid enough warning. My attempts to find the alternative entrance was not successful and I should not be banned for something in this manner.

And secondly, you are straight up lying about the warning stated that you said "stop camping" No you didn't it isnt there.
Literally not in the chat logs in any manner. You cannot call that camping if it is feasibly not an option. Either you are telling me the rules state that at the end of the round the hale must take a camped blocked corridor that was a guaranteed loss. Or you are admitting I had not been given the volume of time required to find an alternative entrance and therefore shouldn't be banned. Clarify rules about camping and give me more time to react. You literally could have told me the second exit and I would have known. But how can I find a second entrance within 20 seconds?
 
For one, I had made previous attempts to enter the corridor, but the fact is. There is literally no evidence. How on earth do you expect hales, to enter a corridor with a sentry body blocked by an ubered medic with soldiers shooting from behind. The fact is you have no evidence, you didn't provide me why a valid enough warning. My attempts to find the alternative entrance was not successful and I should not be banned for something in this manner.

And secondly, you are straight up lying about the warning stated that you said "stop camping" No you didn't it isnt there.
Literally not in the chat logs in any manner. You cannot call that camping if it is feasibly not an option. Either you are telling me the rules state that at the end of the round the hale must take a camped blocked corridor that was a guaranteed loss. Or you are admitting I had not been given the volume of time required to find an alternative entrance and therefore shouldn't be banned. Clarify rules about camping and give me more time to react. You literally could have told me the second exit and I would have known. But how can I find a second entrance within 20 seconds?

It's not my fault that map is so shitty to the point where it's, according to you, impossible to get through. I know from personal experience it can be hard to get through, but it's definitely possible. Now you're saying "How on earth do you expect hales, to enter a corridor with a sentry blocked by an ubered medic with soldiers shooting from behind." meaning you openly just admitted that you were infact camping, and-or wasting time.
And with all due respect, it's not my problem that you didn't find another way in there. I know there is just one way in there, so that's the way you were supposed to take, and you should've figured that out many minutes before I even arrived.

And I am literally not gonna take any shit from you, I said in admin chat "Hale stop camping", that's not even up for discussion. If there's a way to prove that I said that, I will prove it. How are you gonna call me a liar when you're contradicting yourself on your own post, meaning you had been lying and twisting this to your advantage. I verbally warned you twice, and once again, in admin chat and in normal chat, where you were blatantly ignoring me and not taking me serious.
 
I'd love to see the situation, curious of what is this "camping as hale" anyways, is it straight up afking, avoiding enemy contact on purpose? Or is there really a rule that forbids strategic periods of time of waiting behind a corner for example for an unsuspecting enemy to pop out and face their demise? Or are hales forced to brainlessly charge into enemy fire head first. Not a vsh player/cuckmin but I see nothing wrong in bit of strategising.
 
I'd love to see the situation, curious of what is this "camping as hale" anyways, is it straight up afking, avoiding enemy contact on purpose? Or is there really a rule that forbids strategic periods of time of waiting behind a corner for example for an unsuspecting enemy to pop out and face their demise? Or are hales forced to brainlessly charge into enemy fire head first. Not a vsh player/cuckmin but I see nothing wrong in bit of strategising.

If the hale is AFK, he's AFK and he will be kicked. If it's avoiding enemy contact on purpose, I'll consider it camping and-or wasting time, all depending on the map and the situation. And sure, if there's a large base you shouldn't just charge brainlessly into it, but if you're taking too long and not doing anything, while obviously ignoring warnings and just taunting, waiting for people to come out there, it's obvious to me you're camping - where you will be punished accordingly.
 
I'd love to see the situation, curious of what is this "camping as hale" anyways, is it straight up afking, avoiding enemy contact on purpose? Or is there really a rule that forbids strategic periods of time of waiting behind a corner for example for an unsuspecting enemy to pop out and face their demise? Or are hales forced to brainlessly charge into enemy fire head first. Not a vsh player/cuckmin but I see nothing wrong in bit of strategising.

The «camping as hale» is hard to define but I will give it a try. As hale you are allowed to be strategic smart, but when you get shot at and just escape, and repeat this all the time, it is considered as timewaste and camping. You kinda have to «charge against players all the time» as you said. If it does not work and you get knocked back, use rage and you get less knockback.

I red the chatlog and Magglet got a few warnings from regular players before they called on us.

Of course a demo would have been much appriciated in this case, but we don’t have that.. I would say maybe a slay would have been the best option to try avoid this, but when this happend too often with the same players we kinda need to do something new.
 
To the whole situation I would also add my view. You knew that we were all in the room and you refused to go into the room to kill us. What is not allowed as Hale and violates the server rules, you also wasted 3 minutes before Captain came.
And I think Captain's action was just right, he had several warnings addressed to you, which came in a greater time interval
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hellboy
I said in admin chat "Hale stop camping", that's not even up for discussion.
It is up for discussion for as long as it takes kevin to confirm it. That's why I much rather use my obnoxiously colourful name combined with the admin tag to have the proof much easier available than some command-based shite


Well I am not gonna contribute any further, rules that allow personal views and opinions to affect their criteria for a punishment are stupid imo, this thread is not a place to discuss the rules themselves, my apologies
 
I didn’t for one admit I was camping. I stated I was going for an alternative route after trying to enter that way. Your failure to clarify how I truly broke the rule. Surely if you had announced it in admin it would show you typing @all. I didn’t see any prior warning and I do not believe you actually did.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Jim
I didn’t for one admit I was camping. I stated I was going for an alternative route after trying to enter that way. Your failure to clarify how I truly broke the rule. Surely if you had announced it in admin it would show you typing @all. I didn’t see any prior warning and I do not believe you actually did.

I have said what there is to say. I warned you with the @ command, meaning it doesn't show up in my regular chatlog, and if it's possible for anyone to see, it'd be Kevin. After that warning in @ I warned you in the regular chat, saying you had to go right back down there cause that's where all the players were, which you ignored cause you were texting in the chat at the same time as I told you to get going, which you weren't taking seriously cause in your opinion, you weren't camping. If you weren't camping, then tell me what the hell were you doing then? You're STRAIGHT UP lying and manipulating the situation. What do you call waiting outside a room for someone to come to you, so you can kill them? Don't try to twist this, answer that.
I have several witnesses, including @Furken and Matt-ers, and not to mention that you were reported 3 times for camping - meaning that I wasn't the only one who saw you camping.

And as Zeprus just proved with the picture

Timestamp: 3:38:16 PM: "I am not camping, I'm waiting"
Timestamp: 3:35:32 PM: "I've got all day"
That's atleast 3 minutes BEFORE I even arrived there, possible more than 4 minutes as I did not see you type that.
confused-nigga.jpg


You're contradicting yourself, lying and manipulating this whole situation. If it's up to me, there's no doubt that I'd keep you perma banned.
 
@Le Captain Pootis, if you don't mind I will respond to this thread later. Just in case you were thinking about closing it.
 
Hello there,
After having a few days to cool off from the situation. I would like to explain myself more clearly after reflecting the situation and thinking more carefully and less impulsive from the anger caused.

Firstly, I have not got direct access to my computer at this moment in time. Although I doubt I even stopped the demo at this point it is probabaly useless either way. The demo is lost but whatever we don’t need it to the extent of proving I did something now.

I would like to firstly apologise. I framed @Le Captain Pootis in a bad light and I targeted a lot of anger towards him. He was likely just doing his job. I do heavily disagree that he was able to judge a situation within 20 seconds regardless of the experience he has. But that is not up to me to call. I do admit that in a frame of light I guess I was camping. I do not believe that it was deserving of a ban. I do not agree that I was given a fair amount of time or clear warnings as I am almost certain no @all was given. But who am I to decide. I apologise to anyone involved but the fact is the rule has no clarification. You could argue camping could be just waiting round a corner. The rule in my eyes needs a more specific meaning. My actions were not crystal clean to the rules and considering I guess I was a potential admin candidate was rather stupid of me.

Now I am aware the ban is likely to be permanent so I’m not expecting much sympathy. I broke the rules and it is my own damn fault so whatever. I acted unprofessionally and cannot deny it is my own actions that led to this ban. Now I know I’m not getting an unban. So I would like to thank Da random and Husky. 2 admins very close to my heart who work daily on the trade server and helped me on many situations. Unfortunately a permanent ban is likely to you know he permanent so our paths are not likely to cross again. But you guys are great admins and do not have the ability you guys have, you are some of the reasons why I love panda and I hoped to never see this day. So thank you.

Lastly I would like to apologise to anyone who wasted time on me. People like Zeprus and captain who knew I was destined to be given the boot. I apologise for the time you had to put in and the emotions of anger I likely caused you regularly.

Thanks guys
-mag
 
  • Like
Reactions: TBotV63 and TWC
Hello there,
After having a few days to cool off from the situation. I would like to explain myself more clearly after reflecting the situation and thinking more carefully and less impulsive from the anger caused.

Firstly, I have not got direct access to my computer at this moment in time. Although I doubt I even stopped the demo at this point it is probabaly useless either way. The demo is lost but whatever we don’t need it to the extent of proving I did something now.

I would like to firstly apologise. I framed @Le Captain Pootis in a bad light and I targeted a lot of anger towards him. He was likely just doing his job. I do heavily disagree that he was able to judge a situation within 20 seconds regardless of the experience he has. But that is not up to me to call. I do admit that in a frame of light I guess I was camping. I do not believe that it was deserving of a ban. I do not agree that I was given a fair amount of time or clear warnings as I am almost certain no @all was given. But who am I to decide. I apologise to anyone involved but the fact is the rule has no clarification. You could argue camping could be just waiting round a corner. The rule in my eyes needs a more specific meaning. My actions were not crystal clean to the rules and considering I guess I was a potential admin candidate was rather stupid of me.

Now I am aware the ban is likely to be permanent so I’m not expecting much sympathy. I broke the rules and it is my own damn fault so whatever. I acted unprofessionally and cannot deny it is my own actions that led to this ban. Now I know I’m not getting an unban. So I would like to thank Da random and Husky. 2 admins very close to my heart who work daily on the trade server and helped me on many situations. Unfortunately a permanent ban is likely to you know he permanent so our paths are not likely to cross again. But you guys are great admins and do not have the ability you guys have, you are some of the reasons why I love panda and I hoped to never see this day. So thank you.

Lastly I would like to apologise to anyone who wasted time on me. People like Zeprus and captain who knew I was destined to be given the boot. I apologise for the time you had to put in and the emotions of anger I likely caused you regularly.

Thanks guys
-mag

I know what I said about not having a single doubt about perm banning you, but I've changed my mind since then. And it has nothing to do with this long topic, cause I did what I had to do - which was doing my job. At first I only intended to ban you for 2 hours due to camping not being a serious offense, and only asked another admin to change the ban length to permanent, cause I saw you've had 5 previous bans.

But when I look through your post, I see you're contributing a lot to this community, contributing more than weighing us down (Talking about your bans and gags/mutes if you have any of those), by reporting rulebreakers all the time which convinces me you really care about this community although you've had your fair share of rulebreaking, which makes me want to give you another chance, if it's alright with everyone else whose opinion would be otherwise.

And to reply to what you said in the end, I never wanted to permanently ban you until I found out I had to follow procedure cause you had been banned 5 times previously.
 
I know what I said about not having a single doubt about perm banning you, but I've changed my mind since then. And it has nothing to do with this long topic, cause I did what I had to do - which was doing my job. At first I only intended to ban you for 2 hours due to camping not being a serious offense, and only asked another admin to change the ban length to permanent, cause I saw you've had 5 previous bans.

But when I look through your post, I see you're contributing a lot to this community, contributing more than weighing us down (Talking about your bans and gags/mutes if you have any of those), by reporting rulebreakers all the time which convinces me you really care about this community although you've had your fair share of rulebreaking, which makes me want to give you another chance, if it's alright with everyone else whose opinion would be otherwise.

And to reply to what you said in the end, I never wanted to permanently ban you until I found out I had to follow procedure cause you had been banned 5 times previously.

I’d like to say thank you. But I’m probabaly considered one of the most toxic players I’m aware you have seen my good side. But I’m aware I probably don’t deserve another chance but if you honestly believe I do I won’t say no. I will try my absolute best to improve
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hellboy and TWC
Ignore my previous post.

Seems like the situation has been cleared up, and if anyone has any objections, message either me or @Le Captain Pootis. Captain Pootis and I have come to agreement to unban Magglet.

Closed
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hellboy
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread