SourceBans Ban URL:
Magglet Previous Gags
Name of your Banned Steam Account:
Magglet
Steam ID:
STEAM_0:0:57897786
Date and Time of the Ban:
Invoked on
11-02-17 16:27
Reason for the Ban:
Spam in chat/voice
Admin that Banned you:
@fanthom
Why should you receive a unban for the gag/mute:
Evidence
If I am brutally honest. I believe this ban was completely uncalled for. Upon further investigation of my Gags reason, I was given this evidence with very little explanation as to the actual rule around "spamming" of binds. I specifically asked fanthom the admin that banned me as his definition seems to reign supreme in this situation.
I explained my side of the story and asked for a specific clarification of the exact rule and in which way I broke it.
His reply was as follows:
Magglet : "Can u please the chat bind rules properly and exactly"
Fanthom : "Every admin sees them different when it comes to spam. I rate everything as spam if anyone reposts messages in a row or if they write with cut sentences."
So my outlining argument is, either every trader to ever join panda is a spammer for sending their advert, which clearly isn't the case. Or he is referring to multiple sendings of the exact same post.
Now if he would like to clarify that would be great, but in the evidence provided to me Here, neither have I sent the same bind, or "cut up sentences". I clearly sent two posts in succession. My trade Advert for buying MvM parts, followed by a bind designed to help inexperienced traders clarify Exchange of Value in steam trading cards. (In case you are wondering selling them for 1 scrap is giving your trading partner a 1000% profit margin).
Now I understand that it may be annoying. But I was never asked to stop, I have only ever sent the bind straight after someone who advertises and extremely unfair trade that is clearly there to trip up the inexperienced traders in our community. Considering I am one of the very few long-term traders of Panda I always try and help out those who come through and use it as a platform to get started.
So that is my case presented, the rule in which I broke was not clearly clarified in either way. But in due course, I will be proven wrong so I must apologise for my behaviour.
So condensed, I would like to apologise for my actions against panda that I proceeded to spam a bind deemed unnecessary and in the admin Fanthoms eyes incorrectly used. I beg for your mercy and thank you for your time. Since under my last gag appeal I was told this way the last chance I am assuming this will be swiftly denied.
Thank you to all the Panda community Staff who put the time in to regulate the servers we all love, you guys have been so amazing to me and I appreciate how dedicated and faithful you are to Panda.
Please consider my gag
-Magglet...
Magglet Previous Gags
Name of your Banned Steam Account:
Magglet
Steam ID:
STEAM_0:0:57897786
Date and Time of the Ban:
Invoked on
11-02-17 16:27
Reason for the Ban:
Spam in chat/voice
Admin that Banned you:
@fanthom
Why should you receive a unban for the gag/mute:
Evidence
If I am brutally honest. I believe this ban was completely uncalled for. Upon further investigation of my Gags reason, I was given this evidence with very little explanation as to the actual rule around "spamming" of binds. I specifically asked fanthom the admin that banned me as his definition seems to reign supreme in this situation.
I explained my side of the story and asked for a specific clarification of the exact rule and in which way I broke it.
His reply was as follows:
Magglet : "Can u please the chat bind rules properly and exactly"
Fanthom : "Every admin sees them different when it comes to spam. I rate everything as spam if anyone reposts messages in a row or if they write with cut sentences."
So my outlining argument is, either every trader to ever join panda is a spammer for sending their advert, which clearly isn't the case. Or he is referring to multiple sendings of the exact same post.
Now if he would like to clarify that would be great, but in the evidence provided to me Here, neither have I sent the same bind, or "cut up sentences". I clearly sent two posts in succession. My trade Advert for buying MvM parts, followed by a bind designed to help inexperienced traders clarify Exchange of Value in steam trading cards. (In case you are wondering selling them for 1 scrap is giving your trading partner a 1000% profit margin).
Now I understand that it may be annoying. But I was never asked to stop, I have only ever sent the bind straight after someone who advertises and extremely unfair trade that is clearly there to trip up the inexperienced traders in our community. Considering I am one of the very few long-term traders of Panda I always try and help out those who come through and use it as a platform to get started.
So that is my case presented, the rule in which I broke was not clearly clarified in either way. But in due course, I will be proven wrong so I must apologise for my behaviour.
So condensed, I would like to apologise for my actions against panda that I proceeded to spam a bind deemed unnecessary and in the admin Fanthoms eyes incorrectly used. I beg for your mercy and thank you for your time. Since under my last gag appeal I was told this way the last chance I am assuming this will be swiftly denied.
Thank you to all the Panda community Staff who put the time in to regulate the servers we all love, you guys have been so amazing to me and I appreciate how dedicated and faithful you are to Panda.
Please consider my gag
-Magglet...