yeah I think any scenario where it's not inactive should still be fine, this is a really pointless rule change because the things being complained about are actually already against the rules
guards already cant camp rebel spots/areas that lead to rebel spots so cutting their legs off by no longer allowing them to follow rebelers through vents or secrets potentially seems kind of bad imo
This was never really the intent of the suggestion. Following reds through vents is fine since a red would've activated it already. This is moreso about preventing blus from intentionally doing secrets either on a freeday or just intentionally disabling some of them to prevent reds from rebelling. I feel like this suggestion got misunderstood and I really should've worded it better tbh.
Truthfully the way you worded it made it come off as if every secret is banned for blues to touch. You go on to say they can take ammo secret ammo but only if it's been already activated, but this just adds more and more specifics which are super unnecessary. With how things are worded, would I be getting guardbanned for taking the stormfront secret to get to armory quicker or how about the mario level secret on one of the mario maps? The rule suggestion sounds fantastic but once you start to realize the amount of secrets for every map, it'll lead to cherry picking like baby has said. I do not believe this rule change is necessary. It seems like this suggestion was thrown out there because one person complained about something that was already against the rules. I'm all for map specific rule changes such as the armory secret for jailfort, since a blue can activate it instantly and prevent reds from doing it. But other than that, i don't see this suggestion passing.
