What happened to !fire? (1 Viewer)

[daguywithdashadow]

Everytime I use the !fire command, it says that it needs an incredibly large amount of votes to fire the warden (usually between 50-150 votes). I was wondering, if possible, if this feature could be fixed some time.

 

[mosteraz]

I'm not sure that this statement is still correct (because I only come to #17 for calls anymore/if the statement was ever correct), but as far as I know, this is intentional because it's not possible to simply remove the !fire-command.

 

[daguywithdashadow]

I'm not sure that this statement is still correct (because I only come to #17 for calls anymore/if the statement was ever correct), but as far as I know, this is intentional because it's not possible to simply remove the !fire-command.

Just checked, and this is what I got.

daguywithdashadow wants to fire the current Warden. (1 votes, 55 required)

55's a bit much isnt it?

 

[mosteraz]

Just checked, and this is what I got.

daguywithdashadow wants to fire the current Warden. (1 votes, 55 required)

55's a bit much isnt it?

What I meant is:
We can't remove the command, so we have set the number higher than the maximal player-cap.

 

[daguywithdashadow]

What I meant is:
We can't remove the command, so we have set the number higher than the maximal player-cap.

Oh ok then.

 

[Kevin]

Just checked, and this is what I got.

daguywithdashadow wants to fire the current Warden. (1 votes, 55 required)

55's a bit much isnt it?

55 out of 24 max players is fine (X