Declined Poll for intention false orders (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

gok-ew

Active Member
Donator
Joined
May 4, 2021
Messages
59
I've seen instances in which inadequate Wardens cannot solve an abundance of false orders spoken by other BLUs, and end up compromising the round. And given that the rules state that trick orders aren't allowed (excluding LR), should the same apply for REDs in the case of false orders?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
can you rephrase what you mean? kind of confusing as is
 
To people wondering what this means, they meant reds giving false orders.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BunniWitch
Nah its fine the way it is ngl. It happens rather scarcely and is kind of easily stopped if youre paying attention
 
reds giving false orders is fine it can also be funny when you don't notice it was a red order and someone dies xD

as for blues the rules make it clear guards can not give orders false or otherwise i see no reason why the rules need to change as when a blue gives a false order it is almost instantly called out and they get warned at the same time further false ordering by the guard then usually gets reported. for example picu
 
As someone who gives false orders when I'm on red, don't enforce this. It's hilarious when not maintained by Warden, and that's their responsibility anyways. If they can't properly control their Reds because someone sounded THAT convincing, they have the option to enable Overtalk Mute and control them all in the moment.
 
As someone who gives false orders when I'm on red, don't enforce this. It's hilarious when not maintained by Warden, and that's their responsibility anyways. If they can't properly control their Reds because someone sounded THAT convincing, they have the option to enable Overtalk Mute and control them all in the moment.
Summarized my thoughts perfectly, wardens can restrict it/overtalk if it becomes a problem.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: PokeMario17
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread