Declined [JB] Possibility of adding a cooldown to the rtv command after map change? (1 Viewer)

[crubf]

from experience across multiple communities across different gamemodes this does not work. if ppl r gonna rtv theyre gonna rtv lol. instead of instant rtvs its people counting down the rtv timer. "3...2...1...RTV RTV GOGOGOGO"

i guess it works if u rly care about squeezing in a round or two even with people being cynical as shit

 

[PistolPoppinSince02]

Nah.
Don't wanna be stuck on Xmf, Miami, or Stormfront any longer than necessary because people (understandably) pressed the 4 button to get the menu out of their face after ONE person nominated it.

 

[Alexander Knyght]

I'm voting no because it takes away player freedom. Yes, the RTV system gets weaponized by bad actors. It comes with the territory and its something we must deal with. If the problem is SO BAD, the simplest solution would be to REMOVE the bad maps that cause this problem. Not change the RTV system because billybumfuck collectively told the server to go to Crossroads, or Miami or Minecraft Nightfall and kill the server or RTV again. If we swept away the garbage in map rotation I don't think we'd be having this conversation but because people have their own opinions and the like, we can't do that. (or they say no cause hahah bad map funny.)

 

[AC Seaweed]

Seriously though, I don’t want to have a map I like immediately rtved. Its fun to have at least a few complete rounds on the instant rtv maps too, so I will vote yes

 

[gaming gamer]

really good idea ngl means we can finally play on underrated maps and game modes, i still haven't played much of certain maps due to this issue. personally i think the 15 minutes is a bit overkill but the 10 minute delay is perfect

 

[Random Gamer]

I am voting yes after people were calling a map slop after we played 1 acutal round on it and yelling at people to rtv

 

[SirKrookodile]

While yes it is annoying when people just refuse to give a map a chance, not being able to swap off a lower popularity map at slower times of the day is a complete server killer.

 

[Pedro]

I am voting yes after people were calling a map slop after we played 1 acutal round on it and yelling at people to rtv

just because we got sweeperer rtv'ed doesnt mean its something to,, you know.

 

[Random Gamer]

just because we got sweeperer rtv'ed doesnt mean its something to,, you know.

you guys were spamming to rtv and other stuff, after 2 rounds kinda makes this suggestion a good suggestion

 

[Pedro]

you guys were spamming to rtv and other stuff, after 2 rounds kinda makes this suggestion a good suggestion

there was 1 guy spamming saying to rtv..

 

[Eagle_attack]

I still need a view why this is being voted no upon

 

[BritishMafia]

I still need a view why this is being voted no upon

imagine this... you're on a map that only got voted because it was the first option in the vote menu, nobody likes it, and the guy who nominated it left.
You've already played the map, so you KNOW its bad, its so bad its a miracle it has been removed... *COUGH COUGH CROSSROADS*
would you A: wait for 15 minutes and have a miserable time before you even have a chance to rtv, or B: leave
most people would pick B, the server ends up dying, all because there was a pointless rtv cooldown that doesn't even solve the problem it was suggested for.

 

[Eagle_attack]

Maybe you are having a miserable time but someone else is having their fun…

Does everybody hate the same map?

and may I say that its only 10 minutes???
Is 2-3 rounds too much??


Vote wont pass anyway but its pretty sad

 

[Mehgend]

if I'm forced to play crossroads I will riot

if only SOMEONE didnt make it all about the damn trees...


Though I never minded playing on bad maps and I rarely mind being forced off a map before it can get going. Not really a change for me.

 

[PFD1]

can we just not make map selection start from having to press 1 or 2? i swear people dont wanna vote any other option between 4 or 5 cause they're too lazy to extend a finger on a better map

 

[Musisphaera]

I still need a view why this is being voted no upon

I mean, I could share why I voted no.

Aside from the 2 points which a lot have made already (that being the player drop in activity and the big map pool we're having), my main point for voting no is that once-in-a-while server wide lag, though I will admit it has lessered since.
The only way to fix that lag is either by having an admin online who could change maps or we directly rtv to the next map.
Now not all admins can be on 24/7, so the rtv would fix that problem. If the RTV is delayed by 10/15 minutees, we're playing on lag for those minutes.

If the lag didn't exist, I might've voted yes.

 

[T0aster]

Nope
The whole point of rtv is that if the "majority" of people want to swap maps, they can.
I don't see the point in stopping people from changing the map, in case an unpopular map is voted for.
Like what Pistol said, some of these maps end up as #4 which a lot of people just insta press to get the menu off their screen.

 

[styraxic]

the reason we get put on these maps in the first place is because everyone just votes the first map they see
rtv is a perfect way to avoid playing bad maps any more than you already have to

 

[Eagle_attack]

Nope
The whole point of rtv is that if the "majority" of people want to swap maps, they can.
I don't see the point in stopping people from changing the map, in case an unpopular map is voted for.
Like what Pistol said, some of these maps end up as #4 which a lot of people just insta press to get the menu off their screen.

What happened to !revote or the thingy that makes you choose between 2 maps after the first vote

 

[hehe troll]

how come i only see "yes please add this" in the replies but there's still more nos than yesses??
anyway um i vote
YES
, mostly because i feel that people don't enjoy the current map rotation at all, sometimes even rtv'ing three times. brother in christ you picked the map!!