Completed Allow(Consensus) on "All/Any custom Lr minigames can be played" (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gale

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2024
Messages
146
Hello! My name does indeed rhyme with NAIL.

The reason I am making this, even though by proxy it is allowed currently is for a few reasons. Firstly, I did feel the suggestion before confused a lot of people. It first said in cells, then it just was really barebones. This needs to be clear and this is MY Lr that I have been doing for a while now. To specify, "all/any custom LR minigame" does not mean it can break rules, you must follow it to the confine of the rules. It simply means that warden can pick which LR Only minigame they want done. Adding onto this, "Why not just type it out?" well it saves time! It fundamentally means the exact same thing, and allows more creatively as TF2's chat has a character limit!

Allowing All Custom Minigames for LR is a LR that simply does what it states, You can do any LR minigame in rules, or if you want to be risky make a combo of 2 that can be possible (HG Simon Says, Meatgrinder Simon Says, HNS With FF). Etc...
This LR has been allowed by multiple staff before as it doesn't break rules within normal conventions. It's an LR that allows people to be creative. I am simply (Re)making this suggestion as one staff has told me it is not allowed, while multiple others have. I wanted that to be made clear, and I wanted to get consensus from people. Server has enjoyed it so far, so I don't believe this should be disallowed. I'd like to hear all feedback if possible. This does not have to be written in the rules, but if this does pass I want this thread to work as a link to send to show people this is valid.

The feedback prior was very positive, but I wanted people to be more informed. Also the previous suggestion was requested to be retracted.
 
Now, the only thing I want players to understand. This is currently allowed. But, the classification of HG and HNS, even pokemon, they are all rounds and thus must be initiated at the start of the round and cannot be ended. Only exceptions being map specific lr only minigames (Dio on lunarpark or vs 25 sentries for example) or ff minigames (exlcuding hg) like meatgrinder or xyz minigame with ff. I want to make sure people understand that if picking this lr.
 
I'm kinda confused, isn't this lr already legal? You clarified the out of bounds stuff in your post already here.
 
Current changes will be:

Changing Simon Says to be a ROUND rather than just a game
Then we add an extra line in the "Last Request" section of the rules:
"Last Requests may be combined by the recipient, provided they do not conflict in a major way (Such as Warday and Hunger Games)"

This should curb bad actors, provide clarification and also allow creative freedom for people to do whatever they want. Well that's the goal anyway, give feedback on wording and the rule itself please! Change goes up on the 1st of February so you have until then to say something.
 
Current changes will be:

Changing Simon Says to be a ROUND rather than just a game
Then we add an extra line in the "Last Request" section of the rules:
"Last Requests may be combined by the recipient, provided they do not conflict in a major way (Such as Warday and Hunger Games)"

This should curb bad actors, provide clarification and also allow creative freedom for people to do whatever they want. Well that's the goal anyway, give feedback on wording and the rule itself please! Change goes up on the 1st of February so you have until then to say something.
Yeah no, i’d rather simon says not become a round long minigame because at a certain point the minigame doesn’t kill. Would rather much have a suggestion for this with a poll.
 
what’s stopping people from just doing Simon Says for 5 seconds then immediately stopping saying they did the LR
 
what’s stopping people from just doing Simon Says for 5 seconds then immediately stopping saying they did the LR
Again, it gets to a point where the minigame plays and nobody gets killed, essentially wasting time. If anything the minigame should be played until an X # of reds are alive and its up to the warden to decide if they even wanna stop it.

This also limits the whole any LR day, essentially restricting that LR by not allowing blues to play other minigames if you’re gonna be copying the same wording of that of like warday/hg (which are considered round and not minigames)
 
Again, it gets to a point where the minigame plays and nobody gets killed, essentially wasting time
Simon Says is an LR that can (and should) be played in conjunction with a standard day playing standard minigames.
If you choose to do a shitty bop it on the yellow line and waste time that’s your choice, you're not forced into it by the rules.

If anything the minigame should be played until an X # of reds are alive and it’s up to the warden to decide if they even wanna stop it.
Yeah but how do you define/enforce that, nobody says "Simon Says until x reds" in their LRs. Do you want it to be implied in an extra line in the rules or something, but that's also annoying to think about.
Also, once again by your definition, what’s stopping warden from just doing Simon Says for 5 seconds then immediately stopping saying they did the LR.

1737992192720.png


This also limits the whole any LR day, essentially restricting that LR by not allowing blues to play other minigames if you’re gonna be copying the same wording of that of like warday/hg (which are considered round and not minigames)
The reason why Warday and HG conflicts is because of FF not being allowed on Warday and because everyone in Warday is KOS, so you cannot give LR which is the entire point of HG.

So it plays into the pre-existing rules and fulfils the gameplay fantasy Mr Galetsu and other people want, doesn't matter that its a round or not, just matters if it conflicts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread