Panda Community

We have one which is multiplying 2 by 2 . Equaling four. Now to simplify things we're going to multiply all the 2s by the amount there is that is adding. Remember that there is one subtraction sign there. There are fifteen 2s.

Multiplying 2 by 15 would give us 30. The equation is simplified to 30 + 28 + 4 - 2 = ? / 2 = Adding 30 to 28 will equal to 58 plus 4 would equal 62. Minus 2 would equal 60. Now you have the answer for the first part. Your equation should end up looking like this. 60/2 = Now for lastly 60/2 gives you the final answer of 30.

The answer would be 30, but the other realistic answer would be nothing. For the fact that you have a 2 + + 2 in the equation. It'll equal nothing for you can't add with those symbols together theoretically in math. Fin. Why did I do this.

Spanky wth

BIDMAS makes it 30 providing the extra + was a mistake. Otherwise it's a mathematical error making it just nothing.

inb4 you say i read spanky comment. I legit didn't.

But wouldn't it be parentheses and not Brackets? Or are they the same?

Or should we just make PNN have the longest comment string? That'll be nice...

Well I posted here for a reason, I dunno

35. However, you can't express an equal statement then have division afterwards. If you meant that the collection of 2's equal x and then you divide x by 2 to get the real answer, you would've done it in two separate lines. i.e.

2+2+2+2+.. = x
x / 2 = ?

Actually nevermind, I meant 30.

But without any real parenthesis to divide up the problem properly it's carried out left to right, order of operations taking priority of course

Im mindblown

Make PNN's status great again!

actually wouldn't you all be wrong? because ?/2=????? would never work, because your using the same variable for both equals, which means all 6 ?'s would have to be the same, making the problem impossible (because your dividing ? by 2, making the 5 other ?'s not equal and 5 ?s cant equal 1 ? anyways) also the 2++2 makes it impossible no matter what

Well. I did say that the other alternative answer would be no solution. To also point out that he placed those question marks because he was curious about what the answer would be.

yea i saw what you said about being no solution, but it would be that no matter what just because of the ++

Also it could be a mathematical mistake on his part to do that, so I ignored those most likely mistypes and solved the equation.

What has this status become?

@yoyoyaso2222 everything

We need more status chains.