Accepted Report against itam and protagonist (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

CutePyro0

Banned
Joined
Aug 19, 2024
Messages
274
Who are you reporting? itam and protagonist

What server game mode is the report concerned with? JB

What is the accused persons's SteamID? itam - STEAM_0:0:55674543 protagonist - STEAM_0:0:773411102

What is the reason of the report? itam - Left Warday location before 6 protagonist - lied as a blue to try and trick reds during deathrun

Files you have as proof Attached Files

Any other proof you have

A bit before the Clip Starts i had already warned protagonist about lying on blue as they kept saying which door reds should take which given this is random blue's can't know this hence them being told the following " protagonist you can't say if it's the left or right door because it's chosen at random and if a red dies because u said something was safe then you have lied as a guard please do not do this"
 

Attachments

  • protagonist and itam - Made with Clipchamp (1).mp4
    58.5 MB
Don't see a problem with it considered a few reds already went through in your clip by the time they even mentioned it.
 
Don't see any lie since they told reds to take the left door, which they knew was safe, because reds already went through it.
 
Wanted to add Itam baited and (accidentally) LR denied

 

Here's whatever the fuck this was.
Trick order at best, freekill at worst.
He is the warden, and the blu just followed his orders (although it was a little trigger happy on their part too)
 
View attachment 33881
Here's whatever the fuck this was.
Trick order at best, freekill at worst.
He is the warden, and the blu just followed his orders (although it was a little trigger happy on their part too)
while he did say hug and face backcell wall he also said "i don't care if your on the beds or not" so yes this is a straightup trick order with the intent to kill reds
 
With protagonist, this genuinely feels like nitpicking. The whole situation with the doors (and the three-paths-only-one-is-safe trap immediately after) was him telling REDs to go left (in both those traps, the left route was the safe route) which I can't see as lying since REDs already went through the correct path (plus you left out the part you mentioned of you supposedly warning him earlier). With the gravel trap, I feel this is only a warn at best since 1. It's easy to tell when that trap is activated vs. not activated yet and 2. Nobody died to the trap. If somebody died to the trap I may have been a little harsher.

Itam, on the other hand, will be punished for his offenses, mainly the baiting/freekill offense provided by BON.

I will consider this report half-accepted.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CutePyro0
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread