"Trusted" - Rank (1 Viewer)

[mosteraz]

First of all: The Stukov-Report gave me that idea.

Well, I just spit out the facts n statistics:

*New Rank: "Trusted" (or something like that)
*Requirements: not set yet
*Function: These users have the right to function as witnesses for reports and/or make reports even through no screenshots are available
*When you have this rank, you don't function as a admin, you rather just play as usual and simply get much more trusted in reports. (Other evidence will still be needed for Permabans)
*Users can not apply for this rank.
*Only Senior Admins (and above of course) can nominate and vote for users, who should get this rank.


I don't know whether this is a dumb idea or not. But.....I thought I could give it a shot.
This only problem is, that people could abuse this power, but thats why only Seniors should have the right to decide that.

 

[Kah]

Most of our admins are already very trusted. No need for a new rank just to make some people feel special.

 

[EvoWarrior5]

Sounds like too much work for something that can be done without a rank. If the community decides that eye witness reports from people the admins trust will suffice as evidence then just roll with it. No special rank needed. As I said, too much work for something that is not needed.

 

[MercyOnly]

How to solve this without R&D:

• record <demo name here>
• https://gameme.panda-community.com/
  
• puush
• print screen + paint + uploading the image

"Trusting" someone is way harder than doing the above, so no.

If you're too lazy to get proof, don't report, but notify an admin to keep watch and/or investigate.

 

[inu]

*cue the trusted rank people jerking off on the amount of attention they suddenly get*

This is literally just some prestige bullshit. Locking as this thread is entirely pointless.

 

[Kevin]

*cue the trusted rank people jerking off on the amount of attention they suddenly get*

This is literally just some prestige bullshit. Locking as this thread is entirely pointless.

indeed, nuff said