Search results

The talking dead :DDDDD (Sorry)

aye

I don't mean to interrupt, but: FF2 Texas FF2 #13 Am I missing something here or why is everyone going neutral?

What's with all the snackwonder.tf admins on here suddenly? Sup.

I skimmed the rules and I couldn't find any place where the warden disconnecting was mentioned specifically. So I'll just assume that this applies: If the system selects the warden it's not a force warden. Thus shouldn't be covered by this, right?

Why would one type the custom LR in teamchat in the first place? Does it display the "Next round LR set to: <lr>" message in chat (for whoever set the LR)?

Please record a demo when reporting stealers, it has been decided that screenshots are no longer sufficient as evidence.

Is not sharing the admins' sense of humor bannable now? I don't find it funny either.

Not if you lack the intent to advertise in the first place. People seem to find it funny to send these (or similar binds). And let's be honest, everyone already knows the cheat mentioned.

You don't need photoshop to post a screenshot. Also given that we have like 30 servers all over the world, red spawn is rather ambiguous.

Patmos is an ex-admin, so am I, perming for advertising cheats was standard procedure when I left and to my knowledge still is. I agree with what Zeprus said, but that's probably better off in the Suggestions. EDIT: Let me point out that these are usually accepted if the individual in question...

@Left 4 Zelda FF2 #13: https://gameme.panda-community.com/player_histories/chat/3001225 FF2 TX: https://gameme.panda-community.com/player_histories/chat/2896295

On the first one, where does it say who sprayed that?

Will this be closed and moved? :kappa:

Is !abort no longer a thing?

See where this "I am Simon" "x is Simon" "Hello I have a dog named Simon" shit gets us? Also the rules aren't some sort of religion, common sense may be applied where necessary, even without there being an extra case example or exception in the rules. As for what the rules say: It appears as...

Being a member of a group alone should never be grounds to uphold a ban. Banning an entire group should always be a last resort. If we have nothing else to hold against someone who was banned for being a member of a group I do not see any reason to uphold the ban, especially given the fact they...

What's the deal here? As far as I remember, quite conclusive evidence came up suggesting that this user had banned alts. If Monster wont respond to this then somebody else should. It's been almost three months for Christ's sake.