This is needed with the amount of people that don't see reds asking for a repeat, like Meatloaf said. It doesn't hurt to try it at least or tweak implementation to something that would be beneficial to the server. An alternative to this if people didn't like the system provided would have to be...
Current Steam name: George DubYou Bush
SteamID: STEAM_0:1:645363509
Which server the rule was broken on: US Jailbreak
The rule or rules they broke: Freekill/Insta DC
Please see the attached video below as evidence
Current Steam name: JaxlingJoe
SteamID: STEAM_0:1:885100950
Which server the rule was broken on: US Jailbreak
The rule or rules they broke: Racism/Insults
Please see the attached screenshot below as evidence
Current Steam name: RAT Murdoch
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:714860601
Which server the rule was broken on: US Jailbreak
The rule or rules they broke: Illegal FF/No mic on blue/Slaying as Warden
Please see the attached videos below as evidence
Current Steam name: Pea sells
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:121369813
Which server the rule was broken on: US Jailbreak
The rule or rules they broke: Inappropriate Chat/Insults
Please see the attached screenshot below as evidence
Peronsally I would rather the warden states before the game starts (which I see a good amount of wardens doing). That way it eliminates all favoritism and still allows a bit of fluidity to where more reds are taken out/live. As a few people as well as myself said- the rule needs clarification...
Current Steam name: syvie.
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:238792026
Which server the rule was broken on: US Jailbreak
The rule or rules they broke: Slurs/Inappropriate Language
Please see the attached screenshot below as evidence
Current Steam name: Eddy
SteamID: STEAM_0:1:926160251
Which server the rule was broken on: US Jailbreak
The rule or rules they broke: Illegal FF/LR Denial
Please see the attached videos below as evidence
(I forgot I wasn't recording at the beginning- a few rounds previous we warned him not to...
Would the same rule not apply? Even if they decided over voice and the warden said beforehand that all ties for example resulted in the red dying, would it not be beneficial for at least the clarification of it?
For this reason specifically I say to let it remain as it is. Warden deciding all ties (at the beginning) really prevents favoritism rather than adding to it.
Current Steam name: Dager
SteamID: STEAM_0:1:615516182
Which server the rule was broken on: US Jailbreak
The rule or rules they broke: Not in Warday Spot (Redside DR)
Please see the attached video below
Current Steam name: Rust
SteamID: STEAM_0:1:561240111
Which server the rule was broken on: US Jailbreak
The rule or rules they broke: Unfriendly chat/Ghosting
Please see the attached chatlogs below
Current Steam name: glowing__milk
SteamID: STEAM_0:1:789527895
Which server the rule was broken on: US Jailbreak
The rule or rules they broke: Illegal FF
Please see the attached video below as evidence (tried warning him not to)
Current Steam name: spectro
SteamID: STEAM_0:1:898765551
Which server the rule was broken on: US Jailbreak
The rule or rules they broke: Racism
Please see the attached video below as evidence (in VC)
Current Steam name: TrainWr3k
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:164297690
Which server the rule was broken on: US Jailbreak
The rule or rules they broke: Deliberate Freekill/Insta DC
Please see the attached video below as evidence
As it stands I find a lot more people are confused when they are killed for using a non-afk stationary taunt than I think we would ever see if the rule was changed. In my opinion the only people that would be affected by this change and might be confused for a couple of days are the regulars who...
Current Steam name: 000
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:711598150
Which server the rule was broken on: US Jailbreak
The rule or rules they broke: Illegal HG
Please see the attached video below as evidence (no LR given last round, just decided to spontaneously do it)
But why shouldn't every taunt be an AFK taunt (barring moving ones ofc)? It seems more like as a collective we are resistant to any change rather than actually voicing why we don't like this specific suggestion. Is saying the words "From now on no lethal taunting" that big of an issue for people?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.