Search results

ive fallen back to not liking the idea very much. ...is this doable? im not sure this would change my mind but that'd be pretty wicked if that's possible

Welcome to panda mister overtime🔥🔥🔥

obviously we dont ban discos that are actually integrated ie night/carcerem. right.

barely failed when there wasnt someone spamming it. dont get your hopes up just yet

lol oh i missed that this is now lr eligible. the only people who are going to get this shit are the people who read the forums which is frankly a small fraction of players, im not very ecstatic for rounds where some reg has to play telephone with a randomed warden on how to play this

still think this btw + when we think about reds working together with ff on think about "ff no killing" lrs, there are a number of people who will kill purely for the funny not even that, im thinking about how it is the entire point of the game for reds to be the last man standing lol

there is way too much shit tied in to this, setting it up sounds rough. requiring a minigame prior sounds like it'd incentivize playing closest minigames to cells for like 2 seconds which people already meme to death because they hate it

https://www.panda-community.com/threads/jb-forfeiting-lr.32264/ and "You can however ask Guards to participate in a DR if it doesn’t directly involve killing them like for example playing obstacle course or fall game. The Warden does not have to participate." So in theory up to 2...

imo there isnt a reason why a guard should opt out since the purpose is to consolidate the blue team together

give lr recipients (the exact moment & same round when they receive !givelr) the ability to /bring blues (not the warden(?)) to an area, limit use to like 1-2 per instance. /bringing blues to a spot which kills them can count as a rebelling action. this might be a part of redux? i think...

ive always thought it was rly stupid that only looping taunts were considered afk. ive seen so many ppl get caught out and confused when they see looping taunters being considered afk but they do like a laugh taunt and theyre gunned down. like a dog. restrict all of them or not imo (personally...

yep exactly. so make all taunts either afk or not afk. simple

not digging the idea of having to tack on modifiers to a crouchwalk order even tho i never give crouchwalk orders in the first place if u want them to tauntwalk just tell them they can

lets see about that. im making the suggestion

which one

good

-4

oh thats annoying the videos arent embedding. oh well

https://www.panda-community.com/data/video/34/34161-0d9e1e1c75893a7d18b5f5fd3d531623.mp4 Since he's exposing his head I would simply just headshot him. His ping is higher than mine so in theory I should win the 1v1. If I lose however I will look at the situation more intensely. If he's just...

Good morning my fellow compatriots. I appreciate you guys taking time out of your day to drop your responses swiftly. I understand the current concern is my lack of sessions. However I feel like a sense of negativity could be derived moreso from my not being an admin for a while. I have yet to...