Declined report (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry I hurt your feelings but you already kind of did this to yourself. Because you keep posting shit ass reports and bad suggestions its not surprising that you have a -113 reaction score, (probably will be more after this report). I only pointed out that we could get you banned because of the rule -250 reaction score because Koduturott pointed out hat you can get banned for having a -250 reaction score, I also pointed it out because you are in the most negative in this server. So sorry for pointing out a rule, maybe don't post bad things if you don't want a negative reaction score, try posting something positive and your reaction score might never reach -250.
 
Sorry I hurt your feelings but you already kind of did this to yourself. Because you keep posting shit ass reports and bad suggestions its not surprising that you have a -113 reaction score, (probably will be more after this report). I only pointed out that we could get you banned because of the rule -250 reaction score because Koduturott pointed out hat you can get banned for having a -250 reaction score, I also pointed it out because you are in the most negative in this server. So sorry for pointing out a rule, maybe don't post bad things if you don't want a negative reaction score, try posting something positive and your reaction score might never reach -250.
i have talked to staff, they acutally denied that -250 reaction score, but you still admited to wanting to negativly react to my posts to get me "banned"
 
right but I never would "wrongly" negatively react your post. I would correctly negatively react you shit ass reports (which is most of them like this one). So if it doesn't matter what your reaction score is why are you trying to get me banned for "negatively" reacting your posts if it doesn't matter?
 
  • Surprised
Reactions: De Luna
right but I never would "wrongly" negatively react your post. I would correctly negatively react you shit ass reports (which is most of them like this one). So if it doesn't matter what your reaction score is why are you trying to get me banned for "negatively" reacting your posts if it doesn't matter?
its still against the rules to enouge or even do a mass negatively reacts, even jokes can be counted as enouging it.
 
No rule states "Don't mass negatively react someone" the rule states "Any form of abuse in the reaction system is forbidden and will lead to consequences. This includes going through old threads to negative react posts made by certain individuals." And I don't think telling people to negatively react someone goes angst this, and there is nothing negative (ban) that comes from having a big negative reaction score. So stop being a child, own up to the fact that people don't like you and negatively react you. And post something positive so that the -133 reaction score can go up.
 
So when you asked if this is reportable in questions I thought you meant the person was actively mass negatively reacting you and had said that they were doing it so you'd get banned, not what this is.

So if you reach -250 you won't get forum banned. It's a joke. There is no auto ban set in place. You're fine.

I can see in the clip that you called the warden a larden for not picking the minigame you wanted to play, then you went straight into the blue's melee range which caused that blue to freekill you when they were trying to hit a rebeling red. You then say you're going to report them and that's when the hostility starts.

I'm sort of dumbfounded that you're not aware that your actions are going to cause negative reactions. If you do this stuff in game and on the forums, people are going to bite back. They aren't just going to sit around and tolerate your behaviour.
So when you are hostile first, you are going to get it back. You need to relax.

I only had a brief look through your posts and those with negative reactions made sense, wasn't some senseless bombing you. The people who do it are random at times. Can usually be the same people, but overall doesn't look like coordinated mob voting, just people mass reacting negative which isn't against rules. Again, to point out, if they purposely did it as a group in a coordinated attack sure it's vote react abuse. But it doesn't look like it. Just people reacting to the content they see on the forums.

If there is a specific time were it was you need to point it out in a report. I don't have the patience or time to go through every single one of your posts to see abusive reacts.
You'll be able to see your reactions via https://www.panda-community.com/account/reactions . If you see a pattern of reacting to old content, then report that. If it's just a one off, don't bother.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread