Declined Furo's Admin Application (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Furo Belle

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2016
Messages
16
Nickname: Furo Belle

Age:17 (Bday: May 6, so 18 soon)

Steam32 ID: STEAM_0:1:49694445

Time Zone: UTC-6 Online time: 2:00 PM - 6:00 PM 8:00 PM - 10:00 PM)

Server: 66.151.244.155:27015 USA 24/7 Freak Fortress 2

Do you own a mic: I don't own a mic.

Previous admin experience: None, I was admin on a server but It was a friends only servers, I did to get to ban some people but i dont recall it.

Have you been admin before: Not really, ive had admin before but it was 4 years ago so I don't really recall the commands, but any further question I could talk with the other admins.

Why should we pick you: I'm normally on when the others admins are offline.

Finally, please briefly explain how you would do your job, e.g. a general overview of your policies and punishments:
Admin Impersonation, Having a close/exact name would be fine IF the admin/person he's impersonating is wfine with it and as long as he doesn't lie about having admin powers.
Offensive language, The most common rule to have, I feel like people take this rule lightly as people toxicity is a big thing nowdays, even in this servers. I normally see people rule baiting (Using soft insults or just trying to justify an insult).
Chat spamming, even tought Im not admin yet I try to make people watch their spam, and if they continue I decide to call an admin to do the job, but when I join the group I would gladly do it after giving a fair warning first.
Mic spamming, the most annoying thing to do I would probably take this rule less lighty as its not something you cant ignore that easily and tends to annoy people pretty easily.
Exploiting, this is a straight up warning a player to stop doing it or ban.
AFK, I would either force them into spec or just kick it (depending how full the server is).
No teaming, this rule is known by alot of people yet I see people doing it alot.
My goal is not to be strict, but rather minimize the toxicity, Instead of making people just get banned for being toxic, I would like to try to make them stop being toxic and just enjoy the game in general, be friend of everyone. But rules come first, friends later. In this case of course.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Bass
Furo is probably one of the most qualified people for this job that I've met here. She enforces the rules efficiently and swiftly like an admin should, as well as she calls me over for rulebreakers very often when something's out of place. She's online often and jumps on the server almost daily. She's very friendly to all players and is a positive influence to have around, yet at the same time when someone breaks a rule she jumps on it quickly (often times faster than I do). Her binds are purposefully light-hearted and she doesn't spam them, except I do admit that they are a bit frequent and common, but I don't believe it's offensive and they should not be any point of concern.

+1 Guaranteed, no doubt.
 
Furo's a good person overall, enforces the rules, and always asks me question if something is or isn't allowed. She's an active player and is nice company, as Speneth says. She seems like a nice addition to the team, so...

... I'm giving her a +1

her chat seems very clean, minus the binds. She's a very nice person attitude wise, and she acts on impending rule breakers and used the !call when necessary. Good luck on your application, Furo.
 
The application is badly formatted and I do see spelling mistakes.
Also your polices are referring to you being a regular player rather than an admin. Also the reason for wanting to become and admin is short. I'd like to at least get to know you a little bit. If anything it sounds like you just want the powers to deal with the 'toxicity' and that's it. Nothing else. What if someone hacks? Will you be bothered to do something then?
 
Spelling mistakes, I'm not from United States. I dont have english classes, I learned from the internet from the ground.

My polices are refering to me being regular player? More like my point of view from what I see every rule.

Why do you even use "What if" Anything can happen and Im well aware of that, but If you're gonna give me an example. Let it be something good instead of a "What If"

I would be bothered, because It's like the "Micspam" situation, it pisses off people and people cant avoid it.
 
That's the whole point of it. What if situations. We need to know how you would respond as an admin to these situations.

With that attitude I am not impressed. You are not taking responsibility and not taking my comment as a form of criticism. Yes maybe 'badly' can be a harsh word, but it is.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Zushikikato Wolfeh
If i may add. Furo add like a list of how you would punish for different situations

for example Mic spam : warning first then 240 minutes mute
Delaying as hale 1) warning 2) slay 3) Ban 240 minutes.
 
If i may add. Furo add like a list of how you would punish for different situations

for example Mic spam : warning first then 240 minutes mute
Delaying as hale 1) warning 2) slay 3) Ban 240 minutes.


Sorry for the late reply @.@ It's been a bad week!

1) Profile rules:

a) Offensive names/Admin Impersonation/Inappropriate personal content
1: Warning
2: Kick
3: 180 minutes ban.

2) Communication rules:

a) Offensive language/Advertising/Chat spamming
1: Warning
2: Second warning
3: Mute (scaling from 180/360/day/perma)


e) Mic spamming
1: Warning
2: Mute (Depending on the situation, insulting is 120/240/day/perma while micspam is 180/360/day/perma)

f) Speaking a foreign language
1: Warning
2: Mute (30 minutes, if he continues it will be the double, and the double)

g) Ghosting
1: Warning
2: Mute (60/120/perma)

3) Rules of play:

a) Use of third-party tools
1: Hacking will be just a temp ban until I get proof. Then it will be a perma for sure!

b) Exploiting/Teaming
1: Warning to stop
2: Slay
3: Ban for:Day/3days/Perma


d) Abuse of the !call
Since mute doesn't actually stop !call command, I would just give them a warning and if they dont obey it's gonna be a ban of 12h/3days/perma)

e) Listen to the admins
1: Warning to stop arguing about something.
2: Mute 180/360/perma

Note: My gags can stack up, meaning that if you break each rule with a different punishment they will add up into the list for a perma, meaning that if you break a rule 3 times its gonna be either perma gag or ban :(
 
Sorry for the late reply @.@ It's been a bad week!

1) Profile rules:

a) Offensive names/Admin Impersonation/Inappropriate personal content
1: Warning
2: Kick
3: 180 minutes ban.

2) Communication rules:

a) Offensive language/Advertising/Chat spamming
1: Warning
2: Second warning
3: Mute (scaling from 180/360/day/perma)


e) Mic spamming
1: Warning
2: Mute (Depending on the situation, insulting is 120/240/day/perma while micspam is 180/360/day/perma)

f) Speaking a foreign language
1: Warning
2: Mute (30 minutes, if he continues it will be the double, and the double)

g) Ghosting
1: Warning
2: Mute (60/120/perma)

3) Rules of play:

a) Use of third-party tools
1: Hacking will be just a temp ban until I get proof. Then it will be a perma for sure!

b) Exploiting/Teaming
1: Warning to stop
2: Slay
3: Ban for:Day/3days/Perma


d) Abuse of the !call
Since mute doesn't actually stop !call command, I would just give them a warning and if they dont obey it's gonna be a ban of 12h/3days/perma)

e) Listen to the admins
1: Warning to stop arguing about something.
2: Mute 180/360/perma

Note: My gags can stack up, meaning that if you break each rule with a different punishment they will add up into the list for a perma, meaning that if you break a rule 3 times its gonna be either perma gag or ban :(

6th punishment should be a perma.
Better if you build up like for instance 4h-8h-1day-1week-1month-perma.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Nitro4D
Thats what happens when you try to reply via gmail on phone, but what I meant to say its just being soft.
Thought you ment stupid XD
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Bass
Thought you ment stupid XD

Nope, I just think it feels like a pat in the back, I know mines are like pretty short lenght, but I would tell them that the 4th would be a perma gag/ban.

Also for the 6 if you mean the hacking one, I dont really wanna ban someone people think its hacking because hes good. So I wanna get proof first.
 
Nope, I just think it feels like a pat in the back, I know mines are like pretty short lenght, but I would tell them that the 4th would be a perma gag/ban.

Also for the 6 if you mean the hacking one, I dont really wanna ban someone people think its hacking because hes good. So I wanna get proof first.
No i mean. 6th communication block or ban should be a perm
 
declined.

you may apply again in 1 month; 24.05.2017
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread